Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LG TorayLG Toray
VS
LyondellBasellLyondellBasell
LG Toray

LG Toray

Toray utca 1, Nyergesújfalu, Komárom-Esztergom 2536, HU

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Az LG Toray zöldmezős beruházásban egy modern technológiai gyárat épít Nyergesújfalun. Profilja az elektromos autókban és elektronikai eszközökben használatos BSF (Battery Separator Film) gyártása, amely egy vékony porózus fólia. Ezt a Li-ion akkumulátorokban elválasztó...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell Tower, Ste. 700, 1221 McKinney Street, Houston, TX, US, 77010

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

We are LyondellBasell (NYSE: LYB) – a leader in the global chemical industry creating solutions for everyday sustainable living. Through advanced technology and focused investments, we are enabling a circular and low carbon economy. Across all we do, we aim to unlock va...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:15,083
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LG Toray

LG Toray

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LG Toray in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LyondellBasell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LG Toray (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Toray cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LyondellBasell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LyondellBasell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LG Toray

LG Toray

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LG Toray company and LyondellBasell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LG Toray and LyondellBasell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LG Toray and LyondellBasell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LG Toray or LyondellBasell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LG Toray or LyondellBasell ?
Between LG Toray and LyondellBasell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LG Toray and LyondellBasell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA