Comparison Overview
LG Innotek

LG Innotek
Building E1/E3, 30, Magokjungang 10-ro, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07796, KR
Last Update: 03/04/2026
LG Innotek is at the forefront of driving future technological advancements in the electronics, mobility, and robotics industries, working hand in hand with customers to realize their visions. Beyond mobile components, the company is expanding its business scope int...

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
Siri Fort Road, New Delhi, 110049, IN
Last Update: 16/09/2026
Established in 1964, BHEL is one of India's largest engineering and manufacturing enterprises in the energy and infrastructure sectors, and a leading power equipment manufacturer globally. BHEL serves the core sectors of the economy and provides a comprehensive portfoli...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LG Innotek







Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LG Innotek in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited in 2026.
Incident History - LG Innotek (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LG Innotek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LG Innotek

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.
Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.
Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/commit/9a6be91e29f2b6738d0b77c33cd1ad5cd3d8a347
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/releases/tag/tdx-gpu-v0.6.27
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/releases/tag/tdx-v0.2.43
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/security/advisories/GHSA-p5fp-g94g-g9m9
- https://privasys.org/blog/binding-attestation-to-the-tls-session
Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.
Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS` file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/commit/0a3073d59f10432eeebea65018b02ef4d0a87fff
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/commit/b5bf23979e7453f7b1cc8ffeb82b3cc2d2ca75e6
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/commit/e4099055711cce327840870c050ce46e58f4aee0
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/security/advisories/GHSA-67hq-5vgg-6f23