Comparison Overview
Harris Brushes

Harris Brushes
Stoke Prior, Bromsgrove, Worcestershire B60 4AE, GB
Last Update: 19/06/2026
Since 1928 we've been at the cutting-edge of product design; more than 90 years later and that passion for innovation can be seen in every one of our brushes, rollers and decorating tools.

Reckitt
103-105 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, GB, SL1 3UH
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Every day, in everything we do, our purpose is to protect, heal and nurture in the relentless pursuit of a cleaner, healthier world. And we have a fight on our hands. A fight to make access to the highest quality hygiene, wellness and nourishment a right and not a privi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Harris Brushes







Reckitt






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Harris Brushes in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Reckitt in 2026.
Incident History - Harris Brushes (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Harris Brushes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Reckitt (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Reckitt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Harris Brushes

Reckitt
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.