Comparison Overview
LG Information Display MEA
LG Information Display MEA
Shatha Tower, Dubai Media City, Dubai, AE
Last Update: 11/02/2026
LG Information Display is a global business partner with its advanced technology and end-to-end services. LG Electronics has already spearheaded in the fields of electronics, communication equipment and home appliances. In the digital signage field, which has been dev...
Foxconn
US
Last Update: 23/09/2026
Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integra...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
LG Information Display MEA
Foxconn
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LG Information Display MEA in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Foxconn has 292.16% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - LG Information Display MEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LG Information Display MEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Foxconn (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foxconn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
LG Information Display MEA
Foxconn
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.