Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LG Electronics ItaliaLG Electronics Italia
VS
Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)
LG Electronics Italia

LG Electronics Italia

Via Aldo Rossi, Milan, Lombardy, 20149, IT

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lg.com/it
754/1000Fair

LG Electronics Inc. LG Electronics è leader e innovatore tecnologico a livello mondiale nel settore dell’elettronica di consumo con una presenza in quasi tutti i Paesi del mondo per un totale di oltre 75.000 dipendenti. Con un fatturato globale pari a 56 miliardi di dol...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:158
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Chicago, 60654, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.motorola.com
792/1000Fair

As part of the Lenovo family, Motorola Mobility is creating innovative smartphones and accessories designed with the consumer in mind. That’s why we’re looking for the thinkers, innovators and problem solvers who believe in working together to challenge the status quo. ...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:17,495
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LG Electronics Italia

LG Electronics Italia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LG Electronics Italia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LG Electronics Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Electronics Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LG Electronics Italia

LG Electronics Italia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LG Electronics Italia company and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LG Electronics Italia and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LG Electronics Italia and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LG Electronics Italia or Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LG Electronics Italia or Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) ?
Between LG Electronics Italia and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LG Electronics Italia and Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9