Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LexisNexis LegalLexisNexis Legal
VS
VMwareVMware
LexisNexis Legal

LexisNexis Legal

1801 Varsity Dr., Raleigh, 27606, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
662/1000Weak

Bringing visibility, value, and simplicity to your everyday operations. LexisNexis Global Software Solutions develops business management technologies that enable law firms, professional services firms and legal departments to streamline workflow, improve collaboration,...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:445
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
VMware

VMware

3401 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, 94304, US

Last Update: 24/06/2026

View Profile
202/1000Critical

Broadcom's VMware software manages cloud complexity so customers can modernize infrastructure, accelerate app development, and protect workloads, wherever these reside. Our flagship cloud solutions provide the security and performance of private cloud combined with the...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12,343
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LexisNexis Legal

LexisNexis Legal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VMware

VMware

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

LexisNexis Legal has 6.54% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

VMware has 560.38% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - LexisNexis Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VMware (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VMware cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LexisNexis Legal

LexisNexis Legal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RELLEX1772562253
VMware

VMware

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
VMW1778840944
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
VMWMICPAPIVA1775500095
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
FEDVMW1772605503

FAQ

Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LexisNexis Legal company and VMware company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LexisNexis Legal and VMware, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LexisNexis Legal and VMware, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LexisNexis Legal or VMware ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LexisNexis Legal or VMware ?
Between LexisNexis Legal and VMware, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LexisNexis Legal and VMware, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2