Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law FirmsLexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms
VS
CadenceCadence
LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms

LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms

9333 n Springboro Pike, Miamisburg, 45342, US

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile

LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law provides 1-50 firms with legal solutions and resources built to fit their needs and challenges. Our tools streamline workflows, improve client services, and help firms succeed in a competitive legal landscape. Here, you'll find valuable in...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:86
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cadence

Cadence

2655 Seely Avenue, San Jose, California, US, 95134

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cadence.com
785/1000Fair

Cadence is a market leader in AI and digital twins, pioneering the application of computational software to accelerate innovation in the engineering design of silicon to systems. Our design solutions, based on Cadence’s Intelligent System Design™ strategy, are essential...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,532
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms

LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cadence

Cadence

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cadence in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cadence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cadence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms

LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cadence

Cadence

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms company and Cadence company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms and Cadence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms and Cadence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms or Cadence ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms or Cadence ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms and Cadence, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LexisNexis Small-Mid Sized Law Firms and Cadence, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8