Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LexfoLexfo
VS
Ingram MicroIngram Micro
Lexfo

Lexfo

5, Rue Saulnier, Paris, 75009, FR

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lexfo.fr
749/1000Moderate

LEXFO is an offensive security firm that assesses and strengthens your systems with an expert, pragmatic, results-driven approach. We cover the full attack chain to better defend you: environment discovery and mapping, security audits and penetration testing, organizati...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:59
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro

3351 Michelson Drive, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, US, 92612

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
100/1000Critical

Ingram Micro is a leading technology company for the global information technology ecosystem. With the ability to reach nearly 90% of the global population, we play a vital role in the worldwide IT sales channel, bringing products and services from technology manufactur...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:28,560
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lexfo

Lexfo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Lexfo has 33.77% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Ingram Micro has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lexfo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexfo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ingram Micro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingram Micro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lexfo

Lexfo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LEX1783931044
Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ING1769038099
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ING1770920806
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ING1802018100325

FAQ

Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lexfo company and Ingram Micro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lexfo and Ingram Micro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lexfo and Ingram Micro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lexfo or Ingram Micro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lexfo or Ingram Micro ?
Between Lexfo and Ingram Micro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lexfo and Ingram Micro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8