Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LexfoLexfo
VS
CACI International IncCACI International Inc
Lexfo

Lexfo

5, Rue Saulnier, Paris, 75009, FR

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lexfo.fr
749/1000Moderate

LEXFO is an offensive security firm that assesses and strengthens your systems with an expert, pragmatic, results-driven approach. We cover the full attack chain to better defend you: environment discovery and mapping, security audits and penetration testing, organizati...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:59
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
CACI International Inc

CACI International Inc

12021 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.caci.com
783/1000Fair

At CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI), our 25,000 talented and dynamic employees are ever vigilant in delivering distinctive expertise and technology to meet our customers’ greatest challenges in national security. We are a company of good character, relentless innovat...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:21,564
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lexfo

Lexfo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CACI International Inc

CACI International Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Lexfo has 31.97% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CACI International Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lexfo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexfo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CACI International Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CACI International Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lexfo

Lexfo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LEX1783931044
CACI International Inc

CACI International Inc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lexfo company and CACI International Inc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lexfo and CACI International Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lexfo and CACI International Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lexfo or CACI International Inc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lexfo or CACI International Inc ?
Between Lexfo and CACI International Inc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lexfo and CACI International Inc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8