Comparison Overview
Levi Strauss & Co.

Levi Strauss & Co.
1155 Battery St, San Francisco, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
You’re an original. So are we. We’re a company of people who like to forge our own path. We invented the blue jean in 1873, and we reinvented khaki pants in 1986. We pioneered labor and environmental guidelines in manufacturing. And we work to build sustainability int...

C&A Brasil
Alameda Araguaia 1222, Barueri, BR
Last Update: 06/09/2026
A C&A foi fundada em 1841 pelos irmãos holandeses Clemens e August. Suas iniciais deram origem ao nome da marca. Somamos mais de 1,8 mil unidades em 24 países da Europa, América Latina e Ásia e estamos entre as maiores redes de varejo do mundo. No Brasil, tudo começou ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Levi Strauss & Co.







C&A Brasil






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
Levi Strauss & Co. has 57.98% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for C&A Brasil in 2026.
Incident History - Levi Strauss & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Levi Strauss & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - C&A Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
C&A Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Levi Strauss & Co.

C&A Brasil
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
DocsGPT through 0.20.0 posts OAuth connector session tokens to a wildcard target origin in the callback-status endpoint without validating sender origin. Attackers can obtain session tokens and provider account emails by acting as window.opener during OAuth authorization, then use tokens to disconnect victims' cloud storage connectors.
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L344-L366
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L515-L527
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/frontend/src/components/ConnectorAuth.tsx#L57-L80
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/issues/2766
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/docsgpt-through-0.20.0-oauth-token-disclosure-via-wildcard-postmessage
DevSpace through 6.3.21 fails to reject parent-directory segments in tar entry names from the in-pod sync stream. Attackers operating a malicious container can stream tar entries with traversal sequences to write arbitrary files on the developer workstation, enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/tar.go#L68-L82
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/util.go#L9-L11
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/issues/3290
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/devspace-through-6.3.21-path-traversal-via-tar-extraction
Refly through 1.1.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /v1/misc/scrape endpoint that fetches caller-supplied URLs without validating the scheme, host, or resolved address. Authenticated attackers can make the backend issue requests to loopback, private, and link-local addresses including cloud metadata services to read page titles and descriptions of internal resources.
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/apps/api/src/modules/misc/misc.controller.ts#L38-L43
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/packages/utils/src/scrape-weblink.ts
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/issues/2280
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/refly-through-1.1.0-server-side-request-forgery-via-scrape-endpoint
GrowthBook through 5.0.1 returns unredacted fact table definitions including raw warehouse SQL in payloads served by unauthenticated public report and experiment endpoints. Attackers with knowledge of a publicly shared report or experiment identifier can read internal data warehouse query text, schema, table names, filter values and datasource identifiers.
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/app.ts#L391-L409
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/services/reports.ts#L880-L890
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/issues/6541
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/growthbook-through-5.0.1-information-disclosure-via-public-endpoints
Flowable flowable-engine through 8.0.0 contains an XML external entity injection vulnerability in ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.parseXml() that fails to disable external entity resolution when parsing deployed BPMN resources. Attackers with process deployment privileges can embed DOCTYPE declarations with external entities in BPMN files to read arbitrary local files or trigger requests to internal network endpoints when diagram layout is computed.
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable-engine/src/main/java/org/flowable/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L101-L118
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable5-engine/src/main/java/org/activiti/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L97-L114
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/issues/4216
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowable-flowable-engine-through-8.0.0-xxe-via-processdiagramlayoutfactory