Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Les Petits Chaperons RougesLes Petits Chaperons Rouges
VS
Home InsteadHome Instead
Les Petits Chaperons Rouges

Les Petits Chaperons Rouges

7 rue Touzet Gaillard , Saint-Ouen, 93400, FR

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lpcr.fr
767/1000Fair

Créés en 2000, pionniers de la profession, Les Petits Chaperons Rouges, Groupe Grandir, sont aujourd’hui un acteur de référence en France et à l’international dans l’éveil et l’éducation. En France, Les Petits Chaperons Rouges c'est : - plus de 9 000 employés - plus d...

NAICS:6241
NAICS Definition:Individual and Family Services
Employees:2,649
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Home Instead

Home Instead

13323 California St, Omaha, NE, US, 68154

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.homeinstead.com
784/1000Fair

As the world’s leading provider of in-home care, we help older adults live safely and independently at home, without sacrificing their quality of life. Whether they need occasional respite care or full-time support, our Care Pros are carefully selected to provide the be...

NAICS:6241
NAICS Definition:Individual and Family Services
Employees:25,165
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Les Petits Chaperons Rouges

Les Petits Chaperons Rouges

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Home Instead

Home Instead

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Individual and Family Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Les Petits Chaperons Rouges in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Individual and Family Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Home Instead in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Les Petits Chaperons Rouges (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Les Petits Chaperons Rouges cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Home Instead (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Home Instead cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Les Petits Chaperons Rouges

Les Petits Chaperons Rouges

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Home Instead

Home Instead

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges company and Home Instead company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges and Home Instead, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges and Home Instead, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Les Petits Chaperons Rouges or Home Instead ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Les Petits Chaperons Rouges or Home Instead ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges and Home Instead, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Les Petits Chaperons Rouges and Home Instead, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2