Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Leonardo DRSLeonardo DRS
VS
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) CareersNaval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers
Leonardo DRS

Leonardo DRS

2345 Crystal Dr, Arlington, 22202, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.leonardodrs.com/
778/1000Fair

Leonardo DRS Inc. (Nasdaq: DRS) is at the forefront of developing transformative defense technologies using its proven agility and delivering innovative solutions for U.S. national security customers and allies worldwide. We specialize in rapidly providing high-performa...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:6,256
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

We are NAVSEA. The Force Behind the Fleet. Join us and become part of a mission-driven team, at one of the best places to work in the federal government. This NAVSEA LinkedIn page is all about connecting with talented individuals ready to make a difference through a rew...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:20,019
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Leonardo DRS

Leonardo DRS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leonardo DRS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Leonardo DRS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leonardo DRS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Leonardo DRS

Leonardo DRS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Leonardo DRS company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Leonardo DRS and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Leonardo DRS and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Leonardo DRS or Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Leonardo DRS or Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers ?
Between Leonardo DRS and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Leonardo DRS and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2