Comparison Overview
Leonardo DRS

Leonardo DRS
2345 Crystal Dr, Arlington, 22202, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Leonardo DRS Inc. (Nasdaq: DRS) is at the forefront of developing transformative defense technologies using its proven agility and delivering innovative solutions for U.S. national security customers and allies worldwide. We specialize in rapidly providing high-performa...

General Dynamics
11011 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 22/09/2026
From Gulfstream business jets and combat vehicles to nuclear-powered submarines and communications systems, people around the world depend on our products and services for their safety and security. General Dynamics is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, and employs ove...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Leonardo DRS







General Dynamics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Leonardo DRS in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
General Dynamics has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Leonardo DRS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Leonardo DRS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Leonardo DRS

General Dynamics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 fails to restrict the advanced_config field to administrators, allowing non-admin users with manage permissions to inject arbitrary nginx directives. Attackers can inject malicious nginx configuration such as alias directives to serve arbitrary files or control routing for their assigned hosts.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/README.md#L36
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/user.js#L52-L62
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/templates/proxy_host.conf#L28
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/5749
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-improper-authorization-via-advanced-config
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 lacks rate-limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any account. Attackers can brute-force login credentials via POST /api/tokens and subsequently guess TOTP codes via POST /api/tokens/2fa to gain full session access and administrative control.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/app.js#L15-L58
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/2fa.js#L196-L240
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/token.js#L154-L182
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-missing-brute-force-protection
httpdbg before 2.2.1 fails to validate URL schemes in recorded HTTP request URLs rendered as clickable links in the web interface. Attackers controlling traffic recorded by httpdbg can supply javascript: scheme URLs that execute malicious scripts in the application origin when clicked, allowing access to captured request and response data including headers and tokens.
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/hooks/recordhttp2.py#L88-L97
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/webapp/static/index.htm#L302
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/commit/121845b41c19ddaf30b51be0797bc2ff4847d8b3
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/issues/220
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/pull/222
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/releases/tag/v2.2.1
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/httpdbg-before-2.2.1-stored-cross-site-scripting-via-javascript-url
Dozzle versions before 11.1.2 fail to sanitize container display names when building ZIP archive entry names in the log download endpoint. Attackers who can label containers can use path traversal sequences to write files outside the extraction directory when users download and extract logs.
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/container/docker/client.go#L610-L614
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/web/download.go#L141-L146
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/commit/bc07db73dd84ce2cb939b744e983a8cfdf29c644
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/pull/5242
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/releases/tag/v11.1.2
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dozzle-before-11.1.2-path-traversal-via-log-zip-download
A vulnerability has been found in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/ZRQos/set_online_client. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.