Comparison Overview
Lensway Group

Lensway Group
Österögatan 4, Stockholm, Kista 164 40, SE
Last Update: 25/04/2026
Lensway Group verkar på fyra marknader och är en av Nordens största e-handlare inom optik med två digitala butiker – Lensway och Lenson. Företaget ägs av EssilorLuxottica, världens ledande tillverkare av bågar och glasögonglas. De centrala ingredienserna i företagets re...

Walmart
702 SW 8th St, Bentonville, Arkansas, US, 72712
Last Update: 19/06/2026
Sixty years ago, Sam Walton started a single mom-and-pop shop and transformed it into the world’s biggest retailer. Since those founding days, one thing has remained consistent: our commitment to helping our customers save money so they can live better. Today, we’re rei...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lensway Group







Walmart






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lensway Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Walmart has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Lensway Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lensway Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Walmart (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Walmart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lensway Group

Walmart
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.