Comparison Overview
Lensway Group

Lensway Group
Österögatan 4, Stockholm, Kista 164 40, SE
Last Update: 25/04/2026
Lensway Group verkar på fyra marknader och är en av Nordens största e-handlare inom optik med två digitala butiker – Lensway och Lenson. Företaget ägs av EssilorLuxottica, världens ledande tillverkare av bågar och glasögonglas. De centrala ingredienserna i företagets re...

TFG (The Foschini Group)
340 Voortrekker Road, Cape Town, 7500, ZA
Last Update: 13/09/2026
TFG holds a diversified portfolio of speciality retail assets across various product categories and consumer segments. The Group has a portfolio of 35 leading retail brands, with over 4600 outlets in 23 countries on five continents, offering customers a variety of speci...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lensway Group







TFG (The Foschini Group)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lensway Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TFG (The Foschini Group) in 2026.
Incident History - Lensway Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lensway Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TFG (The Foschini Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TFG (The Foschini Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lensway Group

TFG (The Foschini Group)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.