Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lennar TitleLennar Title
VS
Lopes Consultoria de ImóveisLopes Consultoria de Imóveis
Lennar Title

Lennar Title

5505 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 501, Miami, Florida, US, 33126

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lennartitle.com/
756/1000Fair

Headquartered in Miami, Florida, Lennar Title, Inc. and its subsidiaries are part of Lennar Corporation, a diversified real estate and financial services organization listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: LEN). The company handles both residential and commercial ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:232
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis

Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis

Rua Estados Unidos, 1971, São Paulo, 01427-002, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lopes.com.br
773/1000Fair

A GARANTIA DE SER LOPES A Lopes é a maior empresa de soluções integradas de intermediação, consultoria e promoção de financiamentos de imóveis do Brasil. Está presente em 10 estados - São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Rio Grande do Sul, Para...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,560
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lennar Title

Lennar Title

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis

Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lennar Title in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lennar Title (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lennar Title cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lennar Title

Lennar Title

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis

Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lennar Title company and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lennar Title and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lennar Title and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lennar Title or Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lennar Title or Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis ?
Between Lennar Title and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lennar Title and Lopes Consultoria de Imóveis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3