Comparison Overview
Lennar Central Valley

Lennar Central Valley
Central Valley, 93711, US
Last Update: 11/03/2026
One of the Nation’s leading homebuilders for first-time, move-up, and luxury buyers. At Lennar, we offer communities that also feature Lennar’s Next Gen® – The Home Within A Home® design for easy multigenerational living. Lennar Central Valley currently has 18 brand-ne...

SM Supermalls
Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City, 1300, PH
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The SM Group of companies stands today as an institution, a store, a mall, a bank, a home, a resort, a hotel, and a place to see and experience with the family. One of the core business areas of the SM Group is the Shopping Center Management Corporation, generally ref...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lennar Central Valley







SM Supermalls






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lennar Central Valley in 2026.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SM Supermalls in 2026.
Incident History - Lennar Central Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lennar Central Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SM Supermalls (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SM Supermalls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lennar Central Valley

SM Supermalls
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.