Comparison Overview
Lendo Group

Lendo Group
Hagegata 22, Oslo, 0653, NO
Last Update: 13/05/2026
Welcome to Lendo Group! Consisting of the brands Lendo SE/NO/DK, Mybanker and Compricer. We are the leading marketplaces for financial services in Scandinavia. A place for consumers to seek guidance, browse, get and manage consumer loans, car loans, business loans, cred...

Danske Bank
Bernstorffsgade 40, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, DK, 1577
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Danske Bank – A driver of growth and development For more than a 150 years, Danske Bank has strived to be a driver of growth and development in society. We have developed in tandem with the societies we are part of, and our advisory services, expertise and financial so...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lendo Group







Danske Bank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lendo Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Danske Bank in 2026.
Incident History - Lendo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lendo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Danske Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Danske Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lendo Group

Danske Bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.