Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Leidos AustraliaLeidos Australia
VS
Northrop GrummanNorthrop Grumman
Leidos Australia

Leidos Australia

N/A

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile

Leidos is a Fortune 500® technology, engineering, and science solutions and services leader working to solve the world's toughest challenges in the defence, intelligence, civil, and health markets. Headquartered in Virginia, it currently has 45,000+ employees and report...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:988
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman

2980 Fairview Park Dr, Falls Church, 22042, US

Last Update: 04/05/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

We are a close-knit community of big thinkers collaborating to keep the world safe. Our passion, creativity and expertise bring next-level technology solutions to life in autonomous systems, cyber, C4ISR, strike, space, and logistics and modernization for our customers ...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:81,287
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Leidos Australia

Leidos Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leidos Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Northrop Grumman has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Leidos Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leidos Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Northrop Grumman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northrop Grumman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Leidos Australia

Leidos Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOCULANOR1777876145
🔒 Incident : Breach
NOR933072725

FAQ

Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Leidos Australia company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Leidos Australia and Northrop Grumman, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Leidos Australia and Northrop Grumman, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Leidos Australia or Northrop Grumman ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Leidos Australia or Northrop Grumman ?
Between Leidos Australia and Northrop Grumman, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Leidos Australia and Northrop Grumman, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8