Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Leica Microsystems MedicalLeica Microsystems Medical
VS
Prisma HealthPrisma Health
Leica Microsystems Medical

Leica Microsystems Medical

N/A

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
758/1000Fair

Welcome to the Medical LinkedIn Page of Leica Microsystems! Our medical product portfolio provides microscope solutions for medical professionals in various clinical specialities: spine surgery, neurosurgery, plastic reconstructive surgery, surgical and non-surgical ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prisma Health

Prisma Health

300 E McBee Ave, Greenville, 29601, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Prisma Health is the largest not-for-profit health organization in South Carolina, serving more than 1.2 million patients annually. Our facilities in the Greenville and Columbia surrounding markets are dedicated to improving the health of all South Carolinians through i...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:13,747
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Leica Microsystems Medical

Leica Microsystems Medical

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prisma Health

Prisma Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leica Microsystems Medical in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prisma Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Leica Microsystems Medical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leica Microsystems Medical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prisma Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prisma Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Leica Microsystems Medical

Leica Microsystems Medical

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prisma Health

Prisma Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
PRI33923423

FAQ

Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical company and Prisma Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical and Prisma Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical and Prisma Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Leica Microsystems Medical or Prisma Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Leica Microsystems Medical or Prisma Health ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical and Prisma Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Leica Microsystems Medical and Prisma Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8