Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lehigh White Cement CompanyLehigh White Cement Company
VS
UltraTech CementUltraTech Cement
Lehigh White Cement Company

Lehigh White Cement Company

1601 Forum Place, Suit 1110, West Palm Beach , 33401, US

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

Our company produces, imports and markets white cement throughout North America. Lehigh White Cement takes artistic expression to new heights, allowing architects, engineers and contractors the freedom to choose from an unlimited range of colors, textures, shapes, sizes...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:92
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
799/1000Fair

UltraTech Cement Ltd. is the largest manufacturer of grey cement, Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) and white cement in India. It is also one of the leading cement producers globally. UltraTech as a brand embodies 'strength', 'reliability' and 'innovation'. Together, these attri...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:27,830
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lehigh White Cement Company

Lehigh White Cement Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lehigh White Cement Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UltraTech Cement in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lehigh White Cement Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lehigh White Cement Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UltraTech Cement (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UltraTech Cement cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lehigh White Cement Company

Lehigh White Cement Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company and UltraTech Cement, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company and UltraTech Cement, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lehigh White Cement Company or UltraTech Cement ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lehigh White Cement Company or UltraTech Cement ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company and UltraTech Cement, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lehigh White Cement Company and UltraTech Cement, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2