Comparison Overview
Legrand Norge AS

Legrand Norge AS
undefined, Oslo, undefined, undefined, NO
Last Update: 24/02/2026
We are Legrand Norge, part of the Legrand Group, the leading global specialist in electrical and digital infrastructure solutions in the construction industry. We pride ourselves on our wide and diverse range of high-quality products. Legrand Norge continues to offer al...

Signify
High Tech Campus 48, Eindhoven, North Brabant, NL, 5656 AE
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Signify (Euronext: LIGHT Signify is the world leader in lighting for professionals and consumers. We unlock the extraordinary potential of light for brighter lives and a better world. Our global portfolio of brands deliver advanced products, connected systems and servic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Legrand Norge AS







Signify






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Legrand Norge AS in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Signify in 2026.
Incident History - Legrand Norge AS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Legrand Norge AS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Signify (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Signify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Legrand Norge AS

Signify
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.