Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Legrand FinlandLegrand Finland
VS
VertivVertiv
Legrand Finland

Legrand Finland

Linnoitustie 11, Espoo, 02600 , FI

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.legrand.fi/fi
747/1000Moderate

Legrand on sähköistyksen globaali asiantuntija. Tarjoamme kattavan valikoiman huipputason sähköistysratkaisuja liike-, asuin- ja teollisuuskiinteistöihin. Tavoitteenamme on parantaa ihmisten elämänlaatua muokkaamalla tiloja joissa asumme, työskentelemme ja tapaamme tois...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:106
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vertiv

Vertiv

505 N. Cleveland Ave., Westerville, Columbus, OH, US, 43082

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.Vertiv.com
787/1000Fair

Vertiv is a global leader in critical digital infrastructure for applications in data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments. As businesses, industries, and communities become more connected, we pioneer and deliver end-to-end power ...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:17,244
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Legrand Finland

Legrand Finland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vertiv

Vertiv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legrand Finland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Vertiv has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Legrand Finland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legrand Finland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vertiv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vertiv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Legrand Finland

Legrand Finland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vertiv

Vertiv

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIEVERTRACARTRIDEL1786611575
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TRIVER1786618728

FAQ

Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Legrand Finland company and Vertiv company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Legrand Finland and Vertiv, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Legrand Finland and Vertiv, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Legrand Finland or Vertiv ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Legrand Finland or Vertiv ?
Between Legrand Finland and Vertiv, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Legrand Finland and Vertiv, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8