Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Legrand (Egypt)Legrand (Egypt)
VS
FoxconnFoxconn
Legrand (Egypt)

Legrand (Egypt)

Legrand | Pyramids Heights Office Park | Km 22 Cairo/ Alexandria Desert Road | Building 9C | Giza 12556 | Egypt, Greater Cairo, Giza, 12577, EG

Last Update: 27/10/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.legrand.com.eg/
746/1000Moderate

Its comprehensive offering of solutions for use in commercial, industrial and residential markets makes it a benchmark for customers worldwide. Innovation for a steady flow of new products with high added value and acquisition are prime vectors for growth. Legrand repo...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:61
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Foxconn

Foxconn

US

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.foxconn.com
564/1000Very Poor

Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integra...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:99,265
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Legrand (Egypt)

Legrand (Egypt)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Foxconn

Foxconn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legrand (Egypt) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Foxconn has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Legrand (Egypt) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legrand (Egypt) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Foxconn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxconn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Legrand (Egypt)

Legrand (Egypt)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Foxconn

Foxconn

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GOOFOXAPP1778617574
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNIWESFOX1780562007
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ANTFOX7-ECARGIT1781576848

FAQ

Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) company and Foxconn company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) and Foxconn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) and Foxconn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Legrand (Egypt) or Foxconn ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Legrand (Egypt) or Foxconn ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) and Foxconn, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Legrand (Egypt) and Foxconn, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA