Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lee Valley ToolsLee Valley Tools
VS
Supermercados Peruanos S.A.Supermercados Peruanos S.A.
Lee Valley Tools

Lee Valley Tools

1090 Morrison Drive, Ottawa, K2H 1C2, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.leevalley.com
709/1000Moderate

Lee Valley is a family-owned business that has been serving users of woodworking and gardening tools since 1978. Our reputation is built on customer satisfaction, honesty and fairness. About one third of our total sales volume is in products of our own design. The vast...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:420
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Supermercados Peruanos S.A.

Supermercados Peruanos S.A.

PE

Last Update: 12/10/2026

View Profile
797/1000Fair

Somos Supermercados Peruanos S.A. (SPSA), la cadena más grande de supermercados en Perú, orgullosos de ser 100% capital peruano y pertenecer al Grupo Intercorp. Tenemos más de 400 tiendas a nivel nacional y 4 formatos: - PlazaVea, nuestra marca líder en recordación ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,023
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lee Valley Tools

Lee Valley Tools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Supermercados Peruanos S.A.

Supermercados Peruanos S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lee Valley Tools in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Supermercados Peruanos S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lee Valley Tools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lee Valley Tools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Supermercados Peruanos S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Supermercados Peruanos S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lee Valley Tools

Lee Valley Tools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEE323072625
Supermercados Peruanos S.A.

Supermercados Peruanos S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lee Valley Tools company and Supermercados Peruanos S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lee Valley Tools and Supermercados Peruanos S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lee Valley Tools and Supermercados Peruanos S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lee Valley Tools or Supermercados Peruanos S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lee Valley Tools or Supermercados Peruanos S.A. ?
Between Lee Valley Tools and Supermercados Peruanos S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lee Valley Tools and Supermercados Peruanos S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9