Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LeasewebLeaseweb
VS
SogetiSogeti
Leaseweb

Leaseweb

Hessenbergweg 95, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1101 CX

Last Update: 10/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.leaseweb.com
705/1000Moderate

Leaseweb is a leading Cloud services and Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) provider serving a worldwide portfolio of 20,000 customers ranging from SMBs to Enterprises. Services include Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Hybrid Hosting, Colocation, Content Delivery Network, C...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:641
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Sogeti

Sogeti

145-151 Quai du Président Roosevelt,, 92 130 Issy-les-Moulineaux , Paris, Paris - Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR, 92130

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sogeti.com
784/1000Fair

Part of the Capgemini Group, Sogeti makes business value through technology for organizations that need to implement innovation at speed and want a local partner with global scale. With a hands-on culture and close proximity to its clients, Sogeti implements solutions t...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,918
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Leaseweb

Leaseweb

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sogeti

Sogeti

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Leaseweb has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sogeti in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Leaseweb (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leaseweb cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sogeti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sogeti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Leaseweb

Leaseweb

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LEAGOOVELOVHHOS1781109328
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEA05528823
Sogeti

Sogeti

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Leaseweb company and Sogeti company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Leaseweb and Sogeti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Leaseweb and Sogeti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Leaseweb or Sogeti ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Leaseweb or Sogeti ?
Between Leaseweb and Sogeti, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Leaseweb and Sogeti, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8