Comparison Overview
Le Labo Fragrances
Le Labo Fragrances
233 Elizabeth Street, New York, undefined, 10012, US
Last Update: 19/02/2026
We believe that there are too many bottles of perfume and not enough soulful fragrances We believe the soul of a fragrance comes from the intention with which it is created and the attention with which it is prepared We believe fine perfumery must create a shock - t...
L'Oréal
41, Rue Martre, Paris, FR, 92110
Last Update: 23/09/2026
No.1 Beauty Group Worldwide. No.1 most innovative company in Europe (Fortune's ranking). We are 90K employees across 150 countries on five continents, united by our shared purpose: creating the beauty that moves the world. Our 37 international brands are divided int...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Le Labo Fragrances
L'Oréal
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Le Labo Fragrances in 2026.
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for L'Oréal in 2026.
Incident History - Le Labo Fragrances (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Le Labo Fragrances cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - L'Oréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
L'Oréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Le Labo Fragrances
L'Oréal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.