Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.
VS
Fred MeyerFred Meyer
GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.

GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.

24 rue de Sèvres, Paris, 75007, FR

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://groupebonmarche.com/
778/1000Fair

Le Groupe Bon Marché cultive depuis 1852 les premières fois. Dès le milieu du XIXe siècle, Aristide Boucicaut, le fondateur du grand magasin de la Rive Gauche, invente l’art de la vente et celui des services aux clients. Il veille à améliorer le confort et les condition...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,363
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fred Meyer

Fred Meyer

N/A

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://www.fredmeyer.com
857/1000Very Good

The Kroger Co., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a food retailer in the United States. The company operates three formats of supermarkets: combination food and drug stores (combo stores), multi department stores, and price impact warehouse stores or marketpla...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:11,233
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.

GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fred Meyer

Fred Meyer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fred Meyer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fred Meyer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fred Meyer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.

GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fred Meyer

Fred Meyer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. company and Fred Meyer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. and Fred Meyer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. and Fred Meyer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. or Fred Meyer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. or Fred Meyer ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. and Fred Meyer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GROUPE BON MARCHÉ : Samaritaine, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche et La Grande Epicerie de Paris. and Fred Meyer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9