Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LCL Banque des EntreprisesLCL Banque des Entreprises
VS
BNP Paribas FortisBNP Paribas Fortis
LCL Banque des Entreprises

LCL Banque des Entreprises

N/A

Last Update: 29/10/2025

View Profile
750/1000Fair

LCL Banque des Entreprises est la banque d’une ETI sur deux et d’une PME sur 4 et développe ses expertises autour de deux grands métiers : La Banque Commerciale (Flux domestiques et internationaux, financements à court, moyen et long terme, placements) et le Corporate F...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

Rue Montagne du Parc 3, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

For over 200 years, BNP Paribas Fortis has helped drive the growth and prosperity of Belgium’s economy and communities. The mission of our 12,000 colleagues is clear: be the trusted financial partner for four million individual customers, businesses and organisations. W...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:12,028
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LCL Banque des Entreprises

LCL Banque des Entreprises

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LCL Banque des Entreprises in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas Fortis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LCL Banque des Entreprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LCL Banque des Entreprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BNP Paribas Fortis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNP Paribas Fortis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LCL Banque des Entreprises

LCL Banque des Entreprises

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LCL Banque des Entreprises or BNP Paribas Fortis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LCL Banque des Entreprises or BNP Paribas Fortis ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LCL Banque des Entreprises and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1