Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L BrandsL Brands
VS
NAPA Auto PartsNAPA Auto Parts
L Brands

L Brands

3 Limited Parkway, Columbus, OH, US, 43230

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bbwinc.com/
792/1000Fair

On August 2, 2021, L Brands (NYSE: LB) completed the separation of the Victoria’s Secret business into an independent, public company through a tax-free spin-off to L Brands shareholders. The new company, named Victoria’s Secret & Co., includes Victoria’s Secret Lingeri...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:9,938
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NAPA Auto Parts

NAPA Auto Parts

2999 Wildwood Pkwy, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30339

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://jobs.genpt.com
790/1000Fair

Through nearly 6,000 auto parts stores and over 16,000 auto care and collision centers in the U.S., NAPA has America’s largest network of parts and care. The NAPA Network is supported by nationwide distribution centers with approximately 800,000 available parts, accesso...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,772
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L Brands

L Brands

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NAPA Auto Parts

NAPA Auto Parts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L Brands in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAPA Auto Parts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L Brands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L Brands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NAPA Auto Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAPA Auto Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L Brands

L Brands

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NAPA Auto Parts

NAPA Auto Parts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L Brands company and NAPA Auto Parts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L Brands and NAPA Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L Brands and NAPA Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L Brands or NAPA Auto Parts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L Brands or NAPA Auto Parts ?
Between L Brands and NAPA Auto Parts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L Brands and NAPA Auto Parts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9