Comparison Overview
LBP AM

LBP AM
36, Quai Henri IV, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75004
Last Update: 12/03/2026
We are a leading European multi-specialist in conviction-based asset management, solutions and sustainable finance. LBP AM is a leading asset manager in France and in Europe in the management of listed assets (investment in listed companies for over 30 years) and Europ...

Dubai Holding
Umm Suqeim Road, across from Madinat Jumeirah, Dubai, 66000 , AE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Dubai Holding is a diversified global investment company that continues to power Dubai’s growth across 10 key sectors, including real estate, hospitality, leisure & entertainment, media, ICT, design, education, retail, manufacturing & logistics and science. Since 2004...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LBP AM







Dubai Holding






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LBP AM in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dubai Holding in 2026.
Incident History - LBP AM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LBP AM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Dubai Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dubai Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LBP AM

Dubai Holding
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.