Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Layer3Layer3
VS
foodpandafoodpanda
Layer3

Layer3

5th Floor, IGI House, Abuja, 234, NG

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.layer3.ng/
755/1000Fair

Layer3 is one of the leading indigenous ICT infrastructure and solutions companies in Nigeria. It has existed for the last 19 years and offers a comprehensive suite of solutions, including cutting-edge Network Solutions, robust Cybersecurity, seamless Access Solutions, ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:128
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
foodpanda

foodpanda

63 Robinson Road, Singapore, 068894, SG

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://careers.foodpanda.com
805/1000Good

At foodpanda, we're on a mission to redefine how food, people, culture and tech are connected. Our panda family consists of problem solvers, designers and thinkers, working around the clock to make foodpanda the most powerful online tool for food convenience in the univ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,790
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Layer3

Layer3

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
foodpanda

foodpanda

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Layer3 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for foodpanda in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Layer3 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Layer3 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - foodpanda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

foodpanda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Layer3

Layer3

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
foodpanda

foodpanda

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Layer3 company and foodpanda company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Layer3 and foodpanda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Layer3 and foodpanda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Layer3 or foodpanda ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Layer3 or foodpanda ?
Between Layer3 and foodpanda, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Layer3 and foodpanda, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9