Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk EngineeringLavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering
VS
SedgwickSedgwick
Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering

Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering

undefined, Gothenburg , undefined, 43634, SE

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lavaretus.com/
750/1000Fair

SPECIALIST INSURANCE UNDERWRITER We provide specialist insurance products to the shipping, power and energy sectors in the capacity as Lloyds’ coverholders. We specialize in floating power & desalination, ship building, logistics and the marine sector with various nic...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.sedgwick.com
684/1000Weak

Sedgwick is the world’s leading risk and claims administration partner, helping clients thrive by navigating the unexpected. The company’s expertise, combined with the most advanced AI-enabled technology available, sets the standard for solutions in claims administratio...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:22,216
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering

Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sedgwick in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sedgwick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sedgwick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering

Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEDSED1767602047
🔒 Incident : Breach
SED549072725

FAQ

Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering company and Sedgwick company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering and Sedgwick, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering and Sedgwick, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering or Sedgwick ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering or Sedgwick ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering and Sedgwick, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lavaretus Underwriting & Risk Engineering and Sedgwick, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8