Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Laubman & Pank OptometristsLaubman & Pank Optometrists
VS
Sam's ClubSam's Club
Laubman & Pank Optometrists

Laubman & Pank Optometrists

undefined, Sydney, undefined, undefined, AU

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

At Laubman & Pank, we care about you and your eyes and we’ve been doing it since 1908. Optometry can be complicated so we like to make it easy for you. Our optometrists check your eye health and recommend the right eye-care for you and your lifestyle, answering any qu...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:82
Subsidiaries:60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sam's Club

Sam's Club

2101 SE Simple Savings Dr, Bentonville, Arkansas, US, 72712

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.samsclub.com
712/1000Moderate

Sam’s Club (Nasdaq: WMT) a division of Walmart Inc., is the membership warehouse club solution for everyday living. Our President and CEO is Chris Nicholas and our headquarters is in Bentonville, AR. For the fiscal year ending January 31, 2023, Sam’s Club’s total revenu...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:47,591
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Laubman & Pank Optometrists

Laubman & Pank Optometrists

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sam's Club

Sam's Club

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laubman & Pank Optometrists in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Sam's Club has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Laubman & Pank Optometrists (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laubman & Pank Optometrists cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sam's Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sam's Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Laubman & Pank Optometrists

Laubman & Pank Optometrists

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sam's Club

Sam's Club

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ELFTEMCOUGRUAMASAMLYF1777580773
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAM021091825
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAM025091825

FAQ

Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists company and Sam's Club company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists and Sam's Club, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists and Sam's Club, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Laubman & Pank Optometrists or Sam's Club ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Laubman & Pank Optometrists or Sam's Club ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists and Sam's Club, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Laubman & Pank Optometrists and Sam's Club, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8