Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Latitude Financial ServicesLatitude Financial Services
VS
PepperstonePepperstone
Latitude Financial Services

Latitude Financial Services

130 Lonsdale St, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
703/1000Moderate

Everyone has aspirations, and a goal that needs financing. However, sometimes dealing with money can leave you feeling a little overwhelmed. As Australia’s biggest non-bank lender, we want to change that. And we will. Latitude is an independent digital payments and fi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:911
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Pepperstone

Pepperstone

Level 16, Tower One, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://pepperstone.com/
742/1000Moderate

Pepperstone is an online Forex and CFD Broker providing traders across the globe with cutting-edge technology to trade the world’s markets. We are driven to provide traders with low-cost pricing across all our instruments including FX, CFDs, Cryptocurrencies and Commodi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:890
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Latitude Financial Services

Latitude Financial Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pepperstone

Pepperstone

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Latitude Financial Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pepperstone in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Latitude Financial Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Latitude Financial Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pepperstone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pepperstone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Latitude Financial Services

Latitude Financial Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAT2535623
Pepperstone

Pepperstone

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PEP201318422

FAQ

Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Latitude Financial Services company and Pepperstone company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Latitude Financial Services and Pepperstone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Latitude Financial Services and Pepperstone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Latitude Financial Services or Pepperstone ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Latitude Financial Services or Pepperstone ?
Between Latitude Financial Services and Pepperstone, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Latitude Financial Services and Pepperstone, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8