Comparison Overview
LATAM Airlines

LATAM Airlines
Avenida Presidente Riesco 5711, Edificio Huidobro, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana de Santiago, CL, 7561114
Last Update: 04/10/2026
We are the leading airline in South America with the largest destinations, frequencies and aircraft fleet offer. We have the largest network of domestic destinations in five South American markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international operations...

Delta Air Lines
1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, 30320-6001, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) is the U.S. global airline leader in safety, innovation, reliability and customer experience. Powered by our employees around the world, Delta has for a decade led the airline industry in operational excellence while maintaining our reputatio...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LATAM Airlines







Delta Air Lines






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LATAM Airlines in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
Delta Air Lines has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - LATAM Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LATAM Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Delta Air Lines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Delta Air Lines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LATAM Airlines

Delta Air Lines
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.