Comparison Overview
Laser Digital
Laser Digital
Kasernenstrasse 1, Zurich, undefined, undefined, CH
Last Update: 05/01/2026
Laser Digital is a Nomura Group company, delivering scalable, robust opportunities across trading, asset management, and ventures in crypto. The team works at higher standards of risk management, compliance, and commercial viability, all driven by a belief in more respo...
Guaranty Trust
Plot 635, Akin Adesola, Victoria Island, Lagos State, Nigeria, Lagos, NG
Last Update: 07/09/2026
We are Guaranty Trust. Founded in 1990, we own and operate one of Africa's best managed banking franchises, serving over 24 million customers across 10 African countries and the United Kingdom. We are Proudly African and Truly International. We believe in getting it r...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Laser Digital
Guaranty Trust
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Laser Digital in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Guaranty Trust has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Laser Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Laser Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Guaranty Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Guaranty Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Laser Digital
Guaranty Trust
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.