Comparison Overview
Laser Digital
Laser Digital
Kasernenstrasse 1, Zurich, undefined, undefined, CH
Last Update: 05/01/2026
Laser Digital is a Nomura Group company, delivering scalable, robust opportunities across trading, asset management, and ventures in crypto. The team works at higher standards of risk management, compliance, and commercial viability, all driven by a belief in more respo...
Commonwealth Bank
., Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Australia’s leading provider of financial services including retail, premium, business and institutional banking, funds management, superannuation, insurance, investment and sharebroking products and services. We are a business with more than 800,000 shareholders and o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Laser Digital
Commonwealth Bank
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Laser Digital in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Commonwealth Bank has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Laser Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Laser Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Commonwealth Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Commonwealth Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Laser Digital
Commonwealth Bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.