Comparison Overview
Lark

Lark
One Raffles Quay, South Tower, Level 23, Singapore, Singapore, SG, 048583
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Lark is a new take on the office suite that is transforming workplace collaboration. Founded in 2016, Lark effectively combines messaging, schedule management and online collaborative documents in a single platform. Setting out to revolutionize the way team members coll...

YouTube
901 Cherry Ave., San Bruno, 94066, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
YouTube is a team-oriented, creative workplace where every single employee has a voice in the choices we make and the features we implement. We work together in small teams to design, develop, and roll out key features and products in very short time frames. Which means...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lark







YouTube






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lark in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
YouTube has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Lark (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - YouTube (X = Date, Y = Severity)
YouTube cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lark

YouTube
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.