Comparison Overview
Lapperre

Lapperre
Stationsstraat, 22, Groot-Bijgaarden, Flemish Region, 1702, BE
Last Update: 08/01/2026
De firma Lapperre, die in 1948 door Adriaan Lapperre werd opgericht, is reeds 65 jaar de referentie op vlak van hoortoestellen en hoorhulpmiddelen. Lapperre maakt deel uit van Sonova Retail Belgium, dat op zijn beurt behoort tot Sonova Group. Dat is ‘s werelds grootste ...

Edwards Lifesciences
One Edwards Way, Irvine, 92614, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Edwards Lifesciences (NYSE: EW), is the leading global structural heart innovation company, driven by a passion to improve patient lives. Through breakthrough technologies, world-class evidence and partnerships with clinicians and healthcare stakeholders, our employees ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lapperre







Edwards Lifesciences






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lapperre in 2026.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edwards Lifesciences in 2026.
Incident History - Lapperre (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lapperre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Edwards Lifesciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edwards Lifesciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lapperre

Edwards Lifesciences
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.