Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
LangChain

LangChain Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

langchain.com

LangChain provides the agent engineering platform and open source frameworks developers need to ship reliable agents fast.


LangChain A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

LangChain
Company Information
Website:http://langchain.com
Employees number:187
Number of followers:477,971
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:langchain.com
LangChain Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
LangChainTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
12/06/2026
741/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
LangChain Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
LangChainTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

LangChain
LangChainModerate
Current Score
741Ba (MODERATE)
01000
6 incidents
-4.2 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
741Before Incident
MAY 2026
744Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 May 2026LangChain
LangChain and LangGraph: Critical LangGraph Vulnerability Chain Enables Full Server Takeover

Critical RCE Vulnerability Chain Disclosed in LangGraph AI Framework

740After Incident
CRITICAL-4
LAN1781267219
Critical RCE Vulnerability Chain Disclosed in LangGraph AI Framework A newly disclosed vulnerability chain in LangGraph, an open-source AI agent framework developed by the creators of LangChain, enables attackers to achieve remote code execution (RCE) on self-hosted deployments. With 46.5 million monthly downloads, LangGraph is widely adopted in enterprise environments, amplifying the risk of exploitation. The flaws stem from the `get_state_history()` function, which retrieves agent checkpoints essentially the AI’s memory from a persistence layer. The vulnerabilities include: - CVE-2025-67644 (CVSS 7.3): An SQL injection flaw in the SQLite checkpointer’s `_metadata_predicate()` function, where user-controlled metadata filter keys are unsafely interpolated into SQL queries, allowing arbitrary SQL manipulation. - CVE-2026-28277: An unsafe msgpack deserialization flaw in the checkpoint loading mechanism. Attackers can exploit the SQL injection to inject malicious msgpack payloads, reconstructing harmful Python objects and triggering `os.system()` execution. - CVE-2026-27022: A similar query injection issue in the Redis checkpointer backend. A successful exploit grants attackers full server compromise, exposing LLM API keys, conversation histories, CRM credentials, customer PII, and internal network access far beyond the scope of a single-session prompt injection. Unlike transient attacks, this provides persistent, retrospective access to all agent operations. The vulnerabilities affect self-hosted deployments using SQLite or Redis checkpointers with user-controllable filter input. LangChain’s managed platform (using PostgreSQL) remains unaffected. Patches are available: - CVE-2025-67644: `langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite ≥ 3.0.1` - CVE-2026-28277: `langgraph ≥ 1.0.10` - CVE-2026-27022: `langgraph-checkpoint-redis ≥ 1.0.2` The incident underscores a growing risk in AI frameworks: traditional vulnerabilities like SQL injection become far more dangerous when embedded in systems with elevated access, long-lived secrets, and trusted identities. Organizations running LangGraph in production are advised to apply patches immediately.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
IMPACT
LLM API keysConversation historiesCRM credentialsCustomer PIIInternal network accessSystems Affected: Self-hosted LangGraph deployments using SQLite or Redis checkpointersOperational Impact: Full server compromise with persistent, retrospective access to all agent operationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of customer PII)
DATA BREACH
LLM API keysConversation historiesCRM credentialsCustomer PIISensitivity Of Data: High (PII, internal credentials, and network access)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
APRIL 2026
744Before Incident
MARCH 2026
743Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
747Before Incident
Vulnerability
17 Feb 2026LangChain
LangChain: Langchain Community SSRF Bypass Vulnerability Exposes Internal Services to Unauthorized Access

Critical SSRF Vulnerability Patched in LangChain’s @langchain/community Package

743After Incident
HIGH-4
LAN1771309474
Critical SSRF Vulnerability Patched in LangChain’s @langchain/community Package The LangChain development team has released a security update for the @langchain/community package to fix a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability (CVE-2026-26019) in the RecursiveUrlLoader class. The flaw, rated 6.1 (Moderate), allowed attackers to bypass domain restrictions and access internal network resources or cloud metadata services. The vulnerability stemmed from weak URL validation in the RecursiveUrlLoader, which relied on a simple String.startsWith() check rather than strict origin validation. This enabled attackers to craft malicious domains (e.g., example.com.attacker.com) that evaded the preventOutside restriction, designed to keep crawlers within the same domain. Additionally, the utility lacked validation against private IP ranges, allowing attackers to force requests to internal services, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints commonly used to steal IAM credentials and session tokens from AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure. Affected versions (≤ 1.1.13) have been patched in version 1.1.14, which introduces two key fixes: 1. Strict origin validation using the URL API, ensuring exact matches for scheme, hostname, and port. 2. A new SSRF validation module that blocks requests to private IP ranges, loopback addresses, and cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254). Developers are advised to upgrade immediately or mitigate risks by avoiding untrusted content in RecursiveUrlLoader or isolating applications in restricted network environments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Potential access to IAM credentials and session tokens from AWS, Google Cloud, and AzureSystems Affected: Applications using @langchain/community ≤ 1.1.13 with RecursiveUrlLoaderOperational Impact: Risk of unauthorized access to internal network resources or cloud metadata servicesIdentity Theft Risk: High (if IAM credentials or session tokens were compromised)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: IAM credentials, session tokens, internal network resourcesSensitivity Of Data: High (cloud metadata, internal services)Data Exfiltration: Possible if exploited
JANUARY 2026
751Before Incident
Vulnerability
07 Jan 2026LangChain
LangChain: Critical LangSmith Account Takeover Vulnerability Puts Users at Risk

Critical LangSmith Vulnerability (CVE-2026-25750) Exposed AI Environments to Token Theft and Account Takeover

746After Incident
CRITICAL-5
LAN1773469421
Critical LangSmith Vulnerability (CVE-2026-25750) Exposed AI Environments to Token Theft and Account Takeover Researchers at Miggo Security uncovered a severe vulnerability in LangSmith, tracked as CVE-2026-25750, that could enable token theft and full account takeover in enterprise AI environments. LangSmith, a platform for debugging and monitoring large language model (LLM) data, processes billions of daily events, amplifying the potential impact of the flaw. The vulnerability stemmed from an insecure API configuration in LangSmith Studio, where the `baseUrl` parameter used to direct frontend requests to backend APIs was implicitly trusted without domain validation. Attackers could exploit this by tricking authenticated users into visiting a malicious site or a compromised webpage containing a crafted link. The victim’s browser would then silently route API requests and session credentials to an attacker-controlled server, enabling session hijacking within a five-minute window before token expiration. Exploitation did not require traditional phishing; instead, the attack executed in the background via malicious JavaScript, leveraging the victim’s active session. Once compromised, attackers could access AI trace histories, exposing raw execution data, proprietary source code, financial records, or sensitive customer information. They could also steal system prompts critical intellectual property defining AI model behavior or manipulate project settings to disrupt observability workflows. LangChain patched the flaw by enforcing a strict allowed origins policy, requiring domains to be pre-approved in account settings. Unauthorized `baseUrl` requests are now automatically blocked. The vulnerability was fully resolved for LangSmith Cloud customers by December 15, 2025, with no evidence of active exploitation reported. However, self-hosted administrators must upgrade to LangSmith v0.12.71 or Helm chart langsmith-0.12.33 to secure their deployments. The official security advisory was published on January 7, 2026.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
API Misconfiguration
IMPACT
Data Compromised: AI trace histories, raw execution data, proprietary source code, financial records, sensitive customer information, system promptsSystems Affected: LangSmith (Cloud and self-hosted deployments)Operational Impact: Disruption of observability workflows, potential manipulation of project settingsIdentity Theft Risk: High (session hijacking, account takeover)
DATA BREACH
AI trace historiesProprietary source codeFinancial recordsSensitive customer informationSystem promptsSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Possible (via session hijacking)
DECEMBER 2025
755Before Incident
Vulnerability
25 Dec 2025LangChain
LangChain: A message from John Furrier, co-founder of SiliconANGLE:

LangGrinch Vulnerability in langchain-core

751After Incident
CRITICAL-4
LAN1766986573
Critical ‘LangGrinch’ Vulnerability in LangChain-Core Exposes AI Agent Secrets A recently disclosed high-severity vulnerability, dubbed LangGrinch, affects langchain-core—a foundational library powering AI agents in production environments. The flaw, tracked with a CVSS score of 9.3, stems from an insecure serialization and deserialization process in the library’s helper functions. Attackers can exploit it via prompt injection, tricking AI agents into generating structured outputs containing LangChain’s internal marker key. When improperly escaped during serialization, this data can later be deserialized as a trusted object, enabling malicious actions. The vulnerability resides in langchain-core itself, a core dependency for frameworks and applications across the AI ecosystem. With 847 million total downloads and tens of millions monthly, the library is deeply embedded in modern AI workflows. Exploitation could lead to full environment variable exfiltration, including cloud credentials, database connection strings, vector database secrets, and LLM API keys—potentially escalating to remote code execution under certain conditions. Security researchers at Cyata identified 12 distinct exploit flows, demonstrating how routine agent operations—such as persisting, streaming, or reconstructing structured data—can inadvertently open attack paths. Notably, the flaw lies in the serialization path, not deserialization, expanding the attack surface reachable from a single prompt. Cyata emphasized the risk of the vulnerability residing in the ecosystem’s "plumbing layer," making it particularly dangerous for production systems. Patches are available in langchain-core versions 1.2.5 and 0.3.81, following ethical disclosure to LangChain’s maintainers, who implemented remediation and additional security hardening. The discovery underscores the evolving security challenges of agentic AI, where governance and permission boundaries become critical as systems move into production.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Serialization/Deserialization Injection
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Environment variables, cloud provider credentials, database and RAG connection strings, vector database secrets, LLM API keysSystems Affected: AI agent frameworks and applications using langchain-coreOperational Impact: Potential full environment variable exfiltration, remote code execution under certain conditions
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Environment variables, credentials, API keysSensitivity Of Data: High (cloud provider credentials, database secrets, LLM API keys)Data Exfiltration: Yes (via outbound HTTP requests)
NOVEMBER 2025
755Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
755Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
755Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
754Before Incident
JULY 2025
754Before Incident
JUNE 2025
758Before Incident
Vulnerability
18 Jun 2025LangChain
LangChain

AgentSmith Vulnerability in LangChain's LangSmith Platform

754After Incident
CRITICAL-4
LAN901061825
Cybersecurity researchers at Noma Security disclosed a critical vulnerability dubbed AgentSmith in LangChain‘s LangSmith platform, specifically affecting its public Prompt Hub. This flaw, with a CVSS score of 8.8, could allow malicious AI agents to steal sensitive user data, including OpenAI API keys, and manipulate responses from large language models (LLMs). The vulnerability exploited harmful proxy configurations, enabling attackers to gain unauthorized access to victims' OpenAI accounts, potentially downloading sensitive datasets, inferring confidential information, or causing financial losses by exhausting API usage quotas. In advanced attacks, the malicious proxy could alter LLM responses, leading to fraud or incorrect automated decisions. LangChain confirmed the issue and deployed a fix, introducing new safety measures to prevent future exploitation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploit
MOTIVATION
Data theftUnauthorized accessFinancial lossFraud
IMPACT
OpenAI API keysUploaded filesVoice inputsSystems Affected: LangSmith's Prompt Hub
DATA BREACH
OpenAI API keysUploaded filesVoice inputsSensitivity Of Data: High
JANUARY 2025
774Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2025LangChain
LangChain and LangGraph: 'Each vulnerability exposes a different class of enterprise data': LangChain framework hit by several worrying security issues — here's what we know

LangChain and LangGraph Patch Critical Vulnerabilities Exposing Sensitive Data

757After Incident
CRITICAL-17
LAN1774635883
LangChain and LangGraph Patch Critical Vulnerabilities Exposing Sensitive Data LangChain and LangGraph, two widely used open-source frameworks for building AI applications, recently addressed three high-severity vulnerabilities that could allow threat actors to exfiltrate sensitive data. With over 60 million combined weekly downloads on the Python Package Index (PyPI), these tools are integral to AI development, powering chatbots, assistants, and multi-step AI workflows. The vulnerabilities included: - CVE-2026-34070 (7.5/10) – A path traversal flaw in LangChain enabling arbitrary file access without validation. - CVE-2025-68664 (9.3/10) – A critical deserialization issue in LangChain leaking API keys and environment secrets. - CVE-2025-67644 (7.3/10) – An SQL injection vulnerability in LangGraph’s SQLite checkpoint implementation, allowing query manipulation. Security researcher Vladimir Tokarev of Cyera noted that these flaws exposed different types of enterprise data, including filesystem files, environment secrets, and conversation histories. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to Docker configurations, prompt injection attacks, and exposure of sensitive workflow data. Patches have been released, with fixes available in the following versions: - CVE-2026-34070: LangChain-core ≥1.2.22 - CVE-2025-68664: LangChain-core ≥0.3.81 or ≥1.2.5 - CVE-2025-67644: LangGraph-checkpoint-sqlite ≥3.0.1 Cyera emphasized that these vulnerabilities highlight broader risks in AI infrastructure, particularly in foundational components like LangChain, which serves as a dependency for hundreds of downstream libraries. The flaws could propagate through the AI stack, affecting integrations and wrappers that inherit the vulnerable code. To mitigate risks, developers were advised to audit configurations, avoid enabling `secrets_from_env=True` when deserializing untrusted data, and treat LLM outputs as untrusted input. Additionally, metadata filter keys should be validated before being passed to checkpoint queries to prevent injection attacks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data ExfiltrationPath TraversalDeserialization VulnerabilitySQL Injection
IMPACT
Filesystem filesEnvironment secretsConversation historiesAPI keysDocker configurationsPrompt injection dataWorkflow dataLangChainLangGraph
DATA BREACH
Filesystem filesEnvironment secretsConversation historiesAPI keysSensitivity Of Data: High

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for LangChain ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on LangChain's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with LangChain ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view LangChain's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
LangChain Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo