Comparison Overview
Landmark Properties, Inc.

Landmark Properties, Inc.
315 Oconee St, None, Athens, Georgia, US, 30601
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Visit our website: www.landmarkproperties.com/ If you are interested in working for Landmark Properties, please visit our career page: http://www.landmarkproperties.com/careers Headquartered in Athens, Georgia, Landmark Properties is a fully-integrated real estate fir...

REMAX
5075 S. Syracuse St., Denver, 80237, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
As one of the leading global real estate franchisors, RE/MAX, LLC is a subsidiary of RE/MAX Holdings (NYSE: RMAX) with more than 140,000 agents in almost 9,000 offices and a presence in more than 110 countries and territories. Nobody in the world sells more real estat...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Landmark Properties, Inc.







REMAX






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Landmark Properties, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for REMAX in 2026.
Incident History - Landmark Properties, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Landmark Properties, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - REMAX (X = Date, Y = Severity)
REMAX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Landmark Properties, Inc.

REMAX
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.