Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)
VS
PortoPorto
Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)

Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)

1001 Elm Street, Suite 301, Manchester, New Hampshire, 03101, US

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ggb.aleragroup.com
750/1000Fair

As of 2024, Landmark Benefits will officially operate as part of Granite Group Benefits, an Alera Group Company. Please visit and follow the Granite Group Benefits page for legal alerts, news, office updates, upcoming webinars, and more: https://www.linkedin.com/company...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Porto

Porto

Avenida Rio Branco, 1489, Sao Paulo, SP, BR, 01205-001

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://porto.vc/linkedin
654/1000Weak

A Porto é mais que uma seguradora, é um ecossistema de soluções de serviços de proteção com tecnologia embarcada, para melhorar e facilitar a experiência do cliente. Com mais de 70 anos de mercado, a atuação da companhia se concentra hoje em quatro pilares estratégicos ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:24,464
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)

Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Porto

Porto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Porto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)

Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Porto

Porto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR3692036090725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR4102041102125

FAQ

Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) company and Porto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) or Porto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) or Porto ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) and Porto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Granite Group Benefits, An Alera Group Company (formerly Landmark Benefits) and Porto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA