Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Landessparkasse zu OldenburgLandessparkasse zu Oldenburg
VS
Crédit MutuelCrédit Mutuel
Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Oldenburg (Oldenburg), DE

Last Update: 31/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lzo.com
755/1000Fair

Für die Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg (LzO) steht die Nähe zu unseren Kundinnen und Kunden an erster Stelle. Das beweisen wir nicht nur mit unseren 109 Filialen vor Ort, wir nehmen uns auch Zeit für Gespräche auf Augenhöhe. Als älteste durchgehend geschäftstätige Sparkas...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:334
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Crédit Mutuel

Crédit Mutuel

46 rue Bastion, Paris, 75017, FR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.creditmutuel.com
763/1000Fair

Un modèle mutualiste au service des clients et des salariés. Réseau bancaire mutualiste constitué de 2124 Caisses locales le Crédit Mutuel se compose de 18 fédérations régionales, couvrant tout le territoire français. Société de personnes et non de capitaux, le Crédi...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:15,406
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Crédit Mutuel

Crédit Mutuel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Mutuel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Crédit Mutuel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Mutuel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Crédit Mutuel

Crédit Mutuel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LA-CAICRE1766406599

FAQ

Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and Crédit Mutuel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and Crédit Mutuel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg or Crédit Mutuel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg or Crédit Mutuel ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and Crédit Mutuel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and Crédit Mutuel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8