Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lancaster UniversityLancaster University
VS
Deakin UniversityDeakin University
Lancaster University

Lancaster University

Bailrigg, Lancaster, GB, LA1 4YW

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/
778/1000Fair

Lancaster University is a leading higher education and research institution in north-west England and one of the largest employers in the area. We are proud of our Lancaster home, as well as our campuses and activities across the world. We believe our greatest assets...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:5,583
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Deakin University

Deakin University

221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, victoria, AU, 3125

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deakin.edu.au/
755/1000Fair

Deakin’s unique identity – rooted in balanced excellence in education and research – has been driving lasting change for a better future since 1974. Over our 50+ year history, Deakin has grown to be one of the top universities worldwide with a truly global presence. Our...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,793
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lancaster University

Lancaster University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Deakin University

Deakin University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lancaster University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deakin University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lancaster University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lancaster University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Deakin University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deakin University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lancaster University

Lancaster University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAN155830323
Deakin University

Deakin University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEA3929722

FAQ

Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lancaster University company and Deakin University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lancaster University and Deakin University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lancaster University and Deakin University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lancaster University or Deakin University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lancaster University or Deakin University ?
Between Lancaster University and Deakin University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lancaster University and Deakin University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES