Comparison Overview
Lancaster University Cyber Security
Lancaster University Cyber Security
Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, GB
Last Update: 24/01/2026
Lancaster University is recognised by the National Cyber Security Centre as an Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research (ACE-CSR) and Cyber Security Education (ACE-CSE). We are the only university in the North West of England with both these awards and a...
USP - Universidade de São Paulo
Rua da Reitoria, 109, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 05508-900
Last Update: 29/03/2026
A Universidade de São Paulo (USP) é uma universidade pública, mantida pelo Estado de São Paulo e ligada à Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (SDECTI). O talento e dedicação dos docentes, alunos e funcionários têm sido reconhecidos po...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Lancaster University Cyber Security
USP - Universidade de São Paulo
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lancaster University Cyber Security in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for USP - Universidade de São Paulo in 2026.
Incident History - Lancaster University Cyber Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lancaster University Cyber Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - USP - Universidade de São Paulo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
USP - Universidade de São Paulo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Lancaster University Cyber Security
USP - Universidade de São Paulo
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.