Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LaingBuisson Data SolutionsLaingBuisson Data Solutions
VS
Tenet HealthcareTenet Healthcare
LaingBuisson Data Solutions

LaingBuisson Data Solutions

First Floor, 24 Angel Gate, London, EC1V 2PT, GB

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

LaingBuisson can help you find and reach your key audience quickly and effectively. We provide a range of contact and organisational data subscriptions and services to clients wanting to communicate with, market to or research a target sector. Our data tools enable clie...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tenet Healthcare

Tenet Healthcare

14201 Dallas Pkwy, Dallas, 75254, US

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tenethealth.com
804/1000Good

Tenet Healthcare Corporation (NYSE: THC) is a diversified healthcare services company headquartered in Dallas. Our care delivery network includes United Surgical Partners International, the largest ambulatory platform in the country, which operates ambulatory surgery ce...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:44,222
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LaingBuisson Data Solutions

LaingBuisson Data Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tenet Healthcare

Tenet Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LaingBuisson Data Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenet Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LaingBuisson Data Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LaingBuisson Data Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tenet Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenet Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LaingBuisson Data Solutions

LaingBuisson Data Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tenet Healthcare

Tenet Healthcare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions company and Tenet Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions and Tenet Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions and Tenet Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LaingBuisson Data Solutions or Tenet Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LaingBuisson Data Solutions or Tenet Healthcare ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions and Tenet Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LaingBuisson Data Solutions and Tenet Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA