Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Los Angeles County Department of Health ServicesLos Angeles County Department of Health Services
VS
Trinity HealthTrinity Health
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

313 N. Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, 90012, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://dhs.lacounty.gov
719/1000Moderate

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (DHS; LADHS) is the 2nd largest municipal hospital system in the United States. With an annual operating budget of over $4 billion USD, DHS operates an extensive healthcare network throughout Los Angeles County, including...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:2,435
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Trinity Health

Trinity Health

20555 Victor Parkway, Livonia, MI, US, 48152

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
679/1000Weak

Trinity Health is one of the largest not-for-profit, Catholic health care systems in the nation. It is a family of 123,000 colleagues and nearly 27,000 physicians and clinicians caring for diverse communities across 26 states. Nationally recognized for care and experien...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:17,122
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Trinity Health

Trinity Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Angeles County Department of Health Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Trinity Health has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Trinity Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trinity Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAH435072725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LOS114061122
Trinity Health

Trinity Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRIMOSOCHREI1774651014
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRI1773772378
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRI1002810112025

FAQ

Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services company and Trinity Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services and Trinity Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services and Trinity Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Los Angeles County Department of Health Services or Trinity Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Los Angeles County Department of Health Services or Trinity Health ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services and Trinity Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Health Services and Trinity Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA