Comparison Overview
LaGuardia Gateway Partners

LaGuardia Gateway Partners
LaGuardia Airport Terminal B , Flushing , 11371 , US
Last Update: 02/06/2026
Welcome to the new LaGuardia Terminal B. LaGuardia Gateway Partners (LGP) is the private organization selected by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to redevelop and manage LaGuardia Airport's Terminal B. In 2022, LaGuardia Gateway completed its historic $...

Lufthansa Group
Airportring, Frankfurt, 60546, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The Lufthansa Group is an aviation company with operations worldwide. It plays a leading role in its European home market. With 109,509 employees, the Lufthansa Group generated revenue of EUR 32.770m in the financial year 2022. The Passenger Airlines segment includes, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LaGuardia Gateway Partners







Lufthansa Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
LaGuardia Gateway Partners has 51.92% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group in 2026.
Incident History - LaGuardia Gateway Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LaGuardia Gateway Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lufthansa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lufthansa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LaGuardia Gateway Partners

Lufthansa Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.