Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lackmann Culinary ServicesLackmann Culinary Services
VS
Suntory Holdings LimitedSuntory Holdings Limited
Lackmann Culinary Services

Lackmann Culinary Services

N/A

Last Update: 09/01/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.lackmann.com/
828/1000Good

Lackmann Culinary Services has been a successful foodservice company since 1964 and prides itself on treating each customer like family. We look to set the standard in the industry by providing customers with the highest level of service and quality, and we are continuo...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:82
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Suntory Holdings Limited

Suntory Holdings Limited

daiba 2-3-3, Minato-ku,, JP

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.suntory.com
788/1000Fair

As a global leader in the beverage industry, Suntory Group aims to inspire the brilliance of life, by creating rich experiences for people, in harmony with nature. Sustained by the gifts of nature and water, the Group offers a uniquely diverse portfolio of products, fro...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,553
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lackmann Culinary Services

Lackmann Culinary Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Suntory Holdings Limited

Suntory Holdings Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lackmann Culinary Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suntory Holdings Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lackmann Culinary Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lackmann Culinary Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Suntory Holdings Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suntory Holdings Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lackmann Culinary Services

Lackmann Culinary Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Suntory Holdings Limited

Suntory Holdings Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lackmann Culinary Services or Suntory Holdings Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lackmann Culinary Services or Suntory Holdings Limited ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lackmann Culinary Services and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2